data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8d84/d8d845d84f7dcd81ac33dc694b085e872dabea44" alt=""
M&M's Ice Cream Cones
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34979/34979a7bd01d09c8f71608003eba4a4becff39a0" alt=""
Really, the only selling point is that you get 6 in a box instead of 4, though these are almost 20% smaller (weight of 79 versus 96). So while I appreciate the effort by M&Ms, they definitely place second in the ice cream cone race (don't worry, we'll add more contestants in due time)
On Second Scoop: Ok, these continue to grow on me, but there is definitely room for improvement. First, I want to clarify my soft comment yesterday. With the weight watchers, I would hit gummy spots, but here, it's more of a soft spot, and it's not bad, it's just not the perfect crunch. Second, I want to point out the M&Ms again. This cone had a healthy smattering of M&Ms. Yesterday, there seemed to be less, but I just may not have been paying enough attention. Lastly, I still don't like the fudge because it just doesn't add much. In fact, I wish it wasn't there, I think it hurts (mild cheap aftertaste) more than it helps (cover up the mildness of the ice cream).
First Place: Drumsticks!
Second Place: M&M ice cream cone
Distant Third: Weight Watchers cones
Nutrition: 79g = 250 / 110-6 / 1 / 3
No comments:
Post a Comment
*** All comments are moderated ***
Expect a delay before they are posted